The three annexes in the sponsor guidance tell you exactly where each breach sits. Some of them leave UKVI no discretion at all.
UKVI suspends a licence where it has reasonable grounds to suspect a breach of sponsor duties, a threat to immigration control, or non-conducive behaviour, pending investigation.
While suspended:
You normally get 20 working days to respond in writing. That response is the whole case — there is no appeal afterwards.
Three outcomes: reinstatement; reinstatement with a downgrade to B-rating and a mandatory action plan, which carries a fee; or revocation.
The sponsor guidance groups grounds by how much discretion UKVI has.
Annex C1 — revocation is mandatory. No discretion.
The first of these is the one that catches ordinary, well-meaning employers. A role that drifts from what was described on the CoS, or a job title that does not match the SOC code, is a mandatory revocation ground — not a conversation.
Annex C2 — revocation is likely.
Annex C3 — revocation is possible.
That last one is worth isolating. It is not an obscure technicality — it appears repeatedly in revocation decisions, and a clawback clause in an employment contract is discoverable at a compliance visit.
Triggers: reasonable suspicion of a breach · verification of information given in a licence or CoS application, including pre-licence visits · a perceived threat to immigration control · suspected non-conducive behaviour · a previous record of poor compliance.
Visits may be announced or unannounced. Officers may:
You must cooperate fully, and you must secure access to third-party premises where sponsored workers are placed. If you supply workers to client sites, that is your obligation to arrange.
This is the consequence employers underestimate.
On revocation, sponsored workers' permission is curtailed to 60 days, or to the remainder of their existing leave if that is less than 60 days.
Within that window each worker must find a new licensed sponsor and apply to switch, apply under a different route, or leave the UK. They may continue working for you only while their permission remains valid.
For a business with a dozen sponsored staff, revocation is not a licensing problem. It is the loss of a dozen employees inside two months.
The 60-day figure is well established in practice, though it derives from separate curtailment guidance rather than the sponsor guidance itself.
There is no right of appeal against refusal, suspension or revocation.
The only challenge route is judicial review — narrow in scope, and subject to strict time limits: promptly, and in any event within 3 months. A pre-action protocol letter is the usual first step. An internal error-correction process exists for limited circumstances.
This is why the 20-working-day response to a suspension matters so much. It is realistically your only opportunity to put your case.
| Circumstance | Period |
|---|---|
| Standard revocation | 12 months |
| Repeat revocation | 24 months |
| Specified civil penalty scenarios | up to 5 years |